Test results for aarch64, pi5, crypto_aead/aes128n8clocv1

[Page version: 20250609 19:52:35]

Measurements for aarch64, pi5, crypto_aead Test results for aarch64, pi5, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/aes128n8clocv1

Computer: pi5
Microarchitecture: aarch64; Cortex-A76 (414fd0b1)
Architecture: aarch64
CPU ID: 414fd0b1
SUPERCOP version: 20250415
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: aes128n8clocv1

Time	Object size	Test size	Implementation	Compiler	Benchmark date	SUPERCOP version
105822	21820 0 0	36364 832 856	`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20250522	20250415
109702	23306 0 0	35903 776 864	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20250522	20250415
111091	20744 0 0	31527 760 840	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20250522	20250415
112549	20998 0 0	32719 776 864	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20250522	20250415
115836	21630 0 0	33527 776 848	`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall`	20250522	20250415

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_14.0.6)`

Compiler output

encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_aes128n8clocv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    72 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    77 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)`

Namespace violations

aes_core.o AES_decrypt T
aes_core.o AES_encrypt T
aes_core.o AES_set_decrypt_key T
aes_core.o AES_set_encrypt_key T
aes_core.o print_state T
cloc.o ae_encrypt T
cloc.o ae_init T
cloc.o process_ad T
utils.o ae_allocate T
utils.o print_cxt T
utils.o pstate T
utils.o xor_block T
utils.o xor_bytes T
utils.o xor_bytes2 T

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:

Implementation	Compiler
`T:ref`	`clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_14.0.6)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)`
`T:ref`	`gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)`