Test results for amd64, nucnuc, crypto_aead/aes128n12clocv1
[Page version: 20241107 11:03:34]
Measurements for amd64, nucnuc, crypto_aead
Test results for amd64, nucnuc, crypto_aead
Test results for crypto_aead/aes128n12clocv1
Computer: nucnuc
Microarchitecture: amd64; Airmont (406c3)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-000406c3-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: aes128n12clocv1
Time | Object size | Test size | Implementation | Compiler | Benchmark date | SUPERCOP version |
210452 | 25434 0 0 | 41247 788 1080 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
215579 | 21595 0 0 | 36215 788 1080 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
218514 | 20405 0 0 | 33386 764 1048 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
219675 | 20323 0 0 | 34065 812 1016 | T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
237753 | 21400 0 0 | 35558 780 1080 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
287980 | 21964 0 0 | 39123 820 1016 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
288315 | 21145 0 0 | 36659 820 1016 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
289150 | 22436 0 0 | 39099 820 1016 | T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
294906 | 20789 0 0 | 35105 812 1016 | T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20240703 | 20240625 |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:78:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:73:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c: for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1) |
T:ref | clang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1) |
T:ref | clang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1) |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_aes128n12clocv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:73:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: 73 | for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: | ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:78:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c: 78 | return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: | ^~~~~~
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
Implementation | Compiler |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110) |
T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110) |