Test results for armeabi, tinker, crypto_aead/aes128n12silcv1

[Page version: 20241215 22:35:41]

Measurements for armeabi, tinker, crypto_aead Test results for armeabi, tinker, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/aes128n12silcv1
Computer: tinker
Microarchitecture: armeabi; Cortex-A17 (410fc0d1)
Architecture: armeabi
CPU ID: unknown CPU ID
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: aes128n12silcv1
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
25025523207 0 037163 420 824T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024103120241022
26706025006 0 036646 392 824T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024103120241022
29528622370 0 033282 392 824T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024103120241022
30962120929 0 029834 384 816T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024103120241022
31779622452 0 032884 388 816T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024103120241022

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.
silc.c: silc.c:39:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:         pstate2("processing nonce:", NULL);
silc.c:         ^
silc.c: silc.c:101:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring message block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:106:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring ciphertext block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:110:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                 pstate2("tag state:", ts);
silc.c:                 ^
silc.c: silc.c:127:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring last partial message block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:132:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                         pstate2("After xoring last partial ciphertext block:", es);
silc.c:                         ^
silc.c: silc.c:136:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:                 pstate2("tag state:", ts);
silc.c:                 ^
silc.c: silc.c:147:2: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:         pstate2("After xoring the legnth of message:", ts);
silc.c:         ^
silc.c: 8 warnings generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 1, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_14.0.6)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function ‘crypto_aead_aes128n12silcv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt’:
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    72 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the ‘for’
encrypt.c:    77 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~
silc.c: silc.c: In function ‘process_ad’:
silc.c: silc.c:39:9: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘pstate2’; did you mean ‘pstate’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:    39 |         pstate2("processing nonce:", NULL);
silc.c:       |         ^~~~~~~
silc.c:       |         pstate

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)

Namespace violations


aes_core.o AES_decrypt T
aes_core.o AES_encrypt T
aes_core.o AES_set_decrypt_key T
aes_core.o AES_set_encrypt_key T
aes_core.o print_state T
silc.o ae_encrypt T
silc.o ae_init T
silc.o process_ad T
utils.o ae_allocate T
utils.o print_cxt T
utils.o pstate T
utils.o pstate2 T
utils.o xor_bytes T
utils.o xor_bytes2 T

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_14.0.6)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (12.2.0)