Test results for amd64, wolfdale, crypto_hash/lux256

[Page version: 20241024 06:28:49]

Measurements for amd64, wolfdale, crypto_hash Test results for amd64, wolfdale, crypto_hash Test results for crypto_hash/lux256
Computer: wolfdale
Microarchitecture: amd64; Core 2 45nm (1067a)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-0001067a-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_hash
Primitive: lux256
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
1987075310 96 063456 908 888T:asmclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
1989275143 96 063088 908 888T:asmclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
1992175278 96 062624 908 888T:asmclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
2062275431 96 060902 900 888T:asmclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
2074375032 96 060246 900 888T:asmclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625

Compiler output


LUX.c: LUX.c:264:5: warning: implicit declaration of function 'LUX25664' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
LUX.c:                          LUX25664(&Te0,state->core,state->buffer,data,doneLength);
LUX.c:                          ^
LUX.c: LUX.c:286:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'LUX51264' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
LUX.c:                         LUX51264(&T640,state->core64,state->buffer64,data,doneLength);
LUX.c:                         ^
LUX.c: 2 warnings generated.
hash.c: In file included from hash.c:2:
hash.c: ./LUX.c:264:5: warning: implicit declaration of function 'LUX25664' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
hash.c:                          LUX25664(&Te0,state->core,state->buffer,data,doneLength);
hash.c:                          ^
hash.c: ./LUX.c:286:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'LUX51264' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
hash.c:                         LUX51264(&T640,state->core64,state->buffer64,data,doneLength);
hash.c:                         ^
hash.c: 2 warnings generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:asmclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:asmclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:asmclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:asmclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:asmclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)

Compiler output


LUX.c: LUX.c: In function 'Update':
LUX.c: LUX.c:264:5: warning: implicit declaration of function 'LUX25664' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
LUX.c:   264 |     LUX25664(&Te0,state->core,state->buffer,data,doneLength);
LUX.c:       |     ^~~~~~~~
LUX.c: LUX.c:286:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'LUX51264' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
LUX.c:   286 |    LUX51264(&T640,state->core64,state->buffer64,data,doneLength);
LUX.c:       |    ^~~~~~~~
hash.c: In file included from hash.c:2:
hash.c: LUX.c: In function 'Update':
hash.c: LUX.c:264:5: warning: implicit declaration of function 'LUX25664' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
hash.c:   264 |     LUX25664(&Te0,state->core,state->buffer,data,doneLength);
hash.c:       |     ^~~~~~~~
hash.c: LUX.c:286:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'LUX51264' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
hash.c:   286 |    LUX51264(&T640,state->core64,state->buffer64,data,doneLength);
hash.c:       |    ^~~~~~~~
try.c: /usr/bin/ld: libcrypto_hash_lux256.a(LUX256-64.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.data' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE
try.c: /usr/bin/ld: libcrypto_hash_lux256.a(LUX512-64.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.data' can not be used when making a PIE object; recompile with -fPIE
try.c: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:asmgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:asmgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:asmgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:asmgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)