Test results for amd64, wolfdale, crypto_aead/aes128n12clocv1

[Page version: 20241024 06:28:49]

Measurements for amd64, wolfdale, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, wolfdale, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/aes128n12clocv1
Computer: wolfdale
Microarchitecture: amd64; Core 2 45nm (1067a)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: GenuineIntel-0001067a-bfebfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20241022
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: aes128n12clocv1
TimeObject sizeTest sizeImplementationCompilerBenchmark dateSUPERCOP version
15228620369 0 033338 764 1048T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
15645621579 0 036199 788 1080T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
15653524400 0 039975 788 1080T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
15685321350 0 035518 780 1080T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
17227120282 0 033953 812 1016T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
17382320836 0 035097 812 1016T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
17519821601 0 037555 820 1016T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
17525322395 0 039155 820 1016T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625
17545122436 0 039075 820 1016T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall2024062820240625

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c:78:2: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'for' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:         ^
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:73:5: note: previous statement is here
encrypt.c:     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:     ^
encrypt.c: 1 warning generated.

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 5, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refclang -march=native -O2 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -O -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -march=native -Os -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)
T:refclang -mcpu=native -O3 -fwrapv -Qunused-arguments -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (Debian_Clang_11.0.1)

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_aes128n12clocv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:73:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    73 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:78:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    78 |  return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |  ^~~~~~

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (10.2.1_20210110)