Test results for amd64, tripwire, crypto_aead/led80n6t4silcv3
[Page version: 20261005 15:57:56]
Measurements for amd64, tripwire, crypto_aead
Test results for amd64, tripwire, crypto_aead
Test results for crypto_aead/led80n6t4silcv3
Computer: tripwire
Microarchitecture: amd64; Zen 5 (b00f21)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: AuthenticAMD-00b00f21-178bfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20261004
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: led80n6t4silcv3
| Time | Object size | Test size | Implementation | Compiler | Benchmark date | SUPERCOP version |
| 1124210 | 6231 0 32 | 31535 1216 1816 | T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20261004 | 20260831 |
| 1157744 | 7116 0 32 | 36903 1216 1816 | T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20261004 | 20260831 |
| 2142879 | 5021 0 32 | 28330 1192 1720 | T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20261004 | 20260831 |
| 2196454 | 5487 0 32 | 30302 1208 1752 | T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20261004 | 20260831 |
| 30245508 | 7671 4 4 | 37505 1232 1816 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20261004 | 20260831 |
| 52494359 | 3166 4 4 | 26548 1208 1720 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20261004 | 20260831 |
| 53500719 | 3872 4 4 | 29305 1232 1816 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20261004 | 20260831 |
| 56887141 | 3756 4 4 | 28662 1216 1752 | T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall | 20261004 | 20260831 |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_led80n6t4silcv3_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:65:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: 65 | for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: | ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:70:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c: 70 | return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: | ^~~~~~
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
| Implementation | Compiler |
| T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
| T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
| T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
| T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
Compiler output
encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_led80n6t4silcv3_vperm_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:65:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c: 65 | for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c: | ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:70:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c: 70 | return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c: | ^~~~~~
silc.c: silc.c: In function 'ae_decrypt':
silc.c: silc.c:194:12: warning: unused variable 'tmpState' [-Wunused-variable]
silc.c: 194 | dqword tmpState;
silc.c: | ^~~~~~~~
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
| Implementation | Compiler |
| T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
| T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
| T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
| T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
Namespace violations
led.o AddConstants T
led.o AddKey T
led.o DEBUG B
led.o FieldMult T
led.o LED D
led.o LED80_enc T
led.o LED_enc T
led.o MixColMatrix R
led.o MixColumn T
led.o ShiftRow T
led.o SubCell T
led.o WORDFILTER R
led.o sbox R
silc.o ae_encrypt T
silc.o ae_init T
silc.o process_ad T
utils.o print_cxt T
utils.o pstate T
utils.o pstate2 T
utils.o xor_bytes T
utils.o xor_bytes2 T
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
| Implementation | Compiler |
| T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
| T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
| T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
| T:ref | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
Namespace violations
led.o ANDMASKH_LED R
led.o ANDMASKL_LED R
led.o ANDMASK_LED R
led.o AddConstants T
led.o AddKey T
led.o BitPermuteStep64 T
led.o FormatInputMask1_LED R
led.o FormatInputMask2_LED R
led.o FormatOutput T
led.o FormateInput T
led.o LED80_InitKEY T
led.o LED80_enc T
led.o Mbox1 R
led.o Mbox2 R
led.o Mbox3 R
led.o Mbox4 R
led.o Mbox5 R
led.o Mbox6 R
led.o Mbox7 R
led.o Mbox8 R
led.o MixColumnWithSbox T
led.o NibbleExchange T
led.o ORMASK_LED R
led.o RC_80 R
led.o SHIFTROWH R
led.o SHIFTROWL R
led.o ShiftRow T
led.o rks B
silc.o ae_clear T
silc.o ae_decrypt T
silc.o ae_encrypt T
silc.o ae_init T
silc.o process_ad T
silc.o zap T
silc.o zpp T
Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
| Implementation | Compiler |
| T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
| T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
| T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |
| T:vperm | gcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0) |