Test results for amd64, tripwire, crypto_aead/aes128n12silcv1

[Page version: 20261005 15:57:56]

Measurements for amd64, tripwire, crypto_aead Test results for amd64, tripwire, crypto_aead Test results for crypto_aead/aes128n12silcv1
Computer: tripwire
Microarchitecture: amd64; Zen 5 (b00f21)
Architecture: amd64
CPU ID: AuthenticAMD-00b00f21-178bfbff
SUPERCOP version: 20261004
Operation: crypto_aead
Primitive: aes128n12silcv1

Compiler output


encrypt.c: encrypt.c: In function 'crypto_aead_aes128n12silcv1_ref_timingleaks_decrypt':
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:72:5: warning: this 'for' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
encrypt.c:    72 |     for(i = 0; i < CRYPTO_ABYTES; i++)
encrypt.c:       |     ^~~
encrypt.c: encrypt.c:77:9: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the 'for'
encrypt.c:    77 |         return RETURN_SUCCESS;
encrypt.c:       |         ^~~~~~
silc.c: silc.c: In function 'process_ad':
silc.c: silc.c:39:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'pstate2'; did you mean 'pstate'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
silc.c:    39 |         pstate2("processing nonce:", NULL);
silc.c:       |         ^~~~~~~
silc.c:       |         pstate

Number of similar (implementation,compiler) pairs: 4, namely:
ImplementationCompiler
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O2 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -O -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)
T:refgcc -march=native -mtune=native -Os -fwrapv -fPIC -fPIE -gdwarf-4 -Wall (14.2.0)